Moving from Broadcast to Movement Campaigning

As the polls began to close in the west on the evening of 18th May, I sat keenly watching the results already rolling in along the east coast. 80s music wafted through my local RSL, mixed in with the distant sound of poker machines. But it didn’t take long for a deeper silence to fall across the assembled. By 7:30 it was clear the tea-leaves, bookies and pollsters had all been wrong – and it was going to be a hard evening for Labor.

I was shocked, but not entirely surprised. I have worked on a number of big campaigns and knew that after coming so close in 2016, that next time was going to be just as tough for Labor, no matter what the media chatter said. 

With the release of Labor’s Election Review, we can now all see the diverse and complicated reasons for Labor’s surprise election loss. There is no one silver bullet. No simple answer. This makes the headlines hard to write, but it is a much more human analysis. It’s also a sign that Weatherill and Emerson have taken their job seriously, avoiding the temptation to hunt witches or seize on easy answers. 

Yes, Clive Palmer shovelled millions into ads. Yes, there were probably too many ambitious policies. Yes, the campaign lacked a clear, compelling narrative. Yes, it was insular, cocksure and poorly structured. 

In the end, Scott Morrison successfully managed to exploit each of these vulnerabilities. 

With the benefit of hindsight, many of these issues could have been fixed. And with a new generation of parliamentary and party leaders, I am sure they will be by 2021.

There is plenty of palace intrigue about who did what and who is to blame – but in all this gossip about the past Labor risks forgetting one of the biggest lessons for the future.

The internal systems which guide the way the party communicates and engages with the community need to evolve, and they need to embrace a new world. 

It seems like every election for ten years has had some kind of digital tagline, like ‘the facebook election’, or ‘the election the internet changed everything’. So after 10 years, why wasn’t digital decision-making given a seat at the big table?

As the review outlines, “the digital team was not empowered to lead any of (their) functions and did not exercise ultimate authority over its work other than in strictly technical areas”. The campaign upped its digital spend by 60 percent compared to 2019, but it didn’t use the money wisely. 

Instead aggressive TV ads were pumped onto an internet audience unwilling to see them – making it impossible to watch YouTube for weeks without being confronted with enormous yellow letters telling you how evil Scott Morrison was. 

This approach also didn’t consider the interactive or relational nature of the internet. Rather than earning people’s attention, or considering the way people interact with these platforms – we were just told what to think. 

There was even one classic example, where a skippable YouTube ad asked if Scott Morrison was even that bad. The answer they wanted you to take away was ‘yes, he is’, but all of the negative examples were shown after the skippable 5 second mark (meaning that few people would have seen them – and many instead would leave with the impression that Scott Morrison wasn’t that bad).

I’m tired of politely having this fight. The era of broadcast politics is over. You can no longer tell people what to think through blunt repetition on commercial television. You cannot demand people’s attention – you must earn it. You must engage people’s curiosity, you have to connect with them emotionally and in turn persuade them.

With devastating effect – this is exactly what the ‘Death Tax’ rumour mill did. It’s what innovative if mischievous digital operatives within Scott Morrison’s campaign did with their low-fi Game of Thrones memes and subterranean whispering campaigns. Two of the most prominent staff have now attached themselves to Boris Johnson’s upcoming election campaign. 

This is a shift from broadcast thinking to movement thinking, and it’s not just an Australian phenomenon. We’re seeing it right across the world. From Black Lives Matter, the UK’s Leave campaign or even organisations like Australia’s GetUp! 

Successful political movements of the modern era share two things in common: They are decentralised and participatory. They put ordinary people at the centre of their story, and grow collective power beyond small groups – organising into a sustainable, long term movement which is bigger and deeper than any one organisation.

This movement-focused approach to communications isn’t new for political parties or advocacy organisations. It largely mirrors their existing field efforts in each electorate. Candidates are usually known in their local communities, work to build relationships with important local stakeholders, grow a team of volunteers – who in turn go speak with voters across the electorate about the issues that matter to them.

Campaigns of the future will need to embrace this thinking – building deeper relationships with the community online, months (or years) in advance. They will need to invite supporters to participate in the campaign – contributing their time, their money and their attention in the pursuit of success.

Let’s hope the lesson is learnt.

    CONTRIBUTOR click to Donate

    The Chifley Research Centre relies on contributions from individuals and organisations to fund our operations, events and research. Without your donations, nothing we do would be possible.

  • Andrew Giles & Ryan Batchelor

    Andrew Giles is the Federal Labor Member for Scullin in Victoria. Ryan Batchelor is a director of the Chifley Research

    Ben Hugosson

    Benedict Hugosson is an Organisational Ombudsman for the Swedish Social Democrats, focusing on training and membership development. Benedict has experience

    Cameron Clyne

    Cameron Clyne is the former CEO of National Australia Bank and now chairman of advisory firm Camel Partners and a

    Carol Johnson

    Professor Carol Johnson - Carol is an Adjunct Professor of Politics at the University of Adelaide and has written extensively

    Catherine King

    Catherine King is the Shadow Minister for Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Development.

    David Coats

    David Coats is in Australia as a Visitor at the Chifley Research Centre. He is a research fellow at the

    Gabrielle Kuiper

    Dr Gabrielle Kuiper has a background in science, sustainability and urban planning. She was previously Senior Adviser, Climate Change, Energy

    Emma Maiden

    Emma Maiden is the former Assistant Secretary of Unions NSW. She is currently Head of Advocacy for Uniting, leading their

    Erin Watt

    Erin Watt is the National Secretary of the Labor Environment Action Network. Erin is a National Political Coordinator for United

    Jim Chalmers

    Jim Chalmers MP is Shadow Treasurer, and the federal Labor Member for Rankin. Prior to his election he was

    Jo-anne Schofield

    Jo-anne Schofield is the National President of United Workers Union.

    Linda Tirado

    Linda Tirado is a completely average American. She also has good rants about how much it sucks to be poor

    Lindy Edwards

    Dr Lindy Edwards is the Associate Head of School in the School of Humanities and Social Sciences at the University

    Terri Butler

    Terri Butler is the Shadow Minister for the Environment and Water, and the federal Labor Member for Griffith, Queensland.

    Tim Kennedy

    Tim Kennedy is national secretary of the United Workers Union, organising for secure jobs and a fair Australia.

    Website design and development by