Stalk the Leader – Liberal Edition

Liberal leadership shenanigans are such fun to watch. They tend combine lethal intent with a heady dose of farce. New platforms, new strategies, even an alternate candidate – none are necessary when the Liberals plot. Indeed, in this week’s episode of ‘Stalk the Leader – Liberal Edition’ the stench of befuddlement wafting from the pores of the Party’s most senior Leaders, clueless about the PM’s ineluctable un-electability, has made this show compulsory viewing. The casus-belli being proffered for the deadly push against the Prime Minister is tales of woe about a Chief of Staff who we are told has been both ruthlessly controlling, yet simultaneously ineffective in preventing nightmares like knighthoods for royals.

So what was this attempted act of regicide meant to achieve? For the key hardheads in the Liberal Party it is as simple as installing a leader who isn’t going to be catastrophically shredded by Newspoll each fortnight.

Perhaps the reason the Liberal Party hasn’t been exactly brimming with other reasons for their dramatic attempt to unseat a first term Prime Minister is because the Liberal Party is not a Party prone to introspection. Unlike leftwing politicians, nurtured on a regular retinue of existential crisis, rightwing politicians are raised to recognise a leader’s pre-eminence. All crises are to be solved with a strong dose of a leader’s authority. If the leader has no authority, if their authority has atrophied, or if they have ‘poor judgment,’ then the answer is simple: change leaders.

Tony Abbott milked that mood when he seized the Crown. He seized the Liberal leadership after adroitly exploiting his party’s allergic reaction to progress. In 2009, two years after the destruction of the Howard Government and during a severe crisis of Conservative confidence, the Liberal Party was forced to choose between modernisation or more of the same. Abbott won on an explicit promise: more of the same.

He pledged no surrender on climate change, but – more importantly – he promised no introspection, let alone contemplation. No consideration of the reasons why the Liberal Party lost the 2007 election. Or how the party’s next government would have to be different from the last.

Abbott’s preference was to indulge the fervent and outlandish demands of his hard rightwing fringe. Rather than confront them with the realities of electoral politics, or the practicalities of government, he let them believe that they were on quest to create Ayn Rand’s Fountainhead. Shock horror: it now turns out Australia isnt exactly rushing to join them.

The Liberal Opposition may have saved time and energy by not reflecting on the new conditions of Australian politics, but it means they now have had to spend that time in government, doing it on the fly. What Abbott denied his party was time to ponder the massive leap from the pre-GFC politics of prosperity – which John Howard so comprehensively mastered – to the far trickier post-GFC politics of austerity.

Prosperity politics revolves around the distribution of benefit. Austerity politics is about the distribution of burden. Austerity politics requires governments to mesh morals with spreadsheets. The right combination of structural cost savings and political calculation must be struck for the overall strategy to receive pubic sanction. Governments have to carefully decide which groups can absorb cuts and also whether asking them to make sacrifices passes muster in the public’s eyes. Get that calculation wrong and you can look forward to experiencing all the acclaim and popularity Joe Hockey is currently experiencing after his disastrous first, and possibly only, federal budget.

Should the Liberal’s opt for new leadership before the next election, the temptation will be to redesign the government’s ‘narrative.’ Better communications instead of better policies – this is always the choice made by a party unwilling to face its problems. The better choice would be for the new leader to embrace the project Abbott has conspicuously rejected: Tory Modernisation. The new leader will have a narrow window to gracefully retreat on the GP Tax and $100,000 degrees – but he or she should go further still.

The new leader should propose a conservative rationale for action on climate change. A conservative case for marriage equality. A conservative crackdown on tax avoidance. And a conservative embrace of pluralism and immigration. Four policies that signal the end of the era of conservative reaction. Four principles that herald the arrival of the conservative reformers.

For Labor, the job is simple: be merciless. Ignore all the chatter about the ‘end of the reform era’. Force the new leader to confront the contradictions between the claims of his hard rightwing supporters, and the wishes of the Australian people. The Right must come to accept the settlement struck in the last century over universal healthcare, balanced industrial-relations, and affordable tertiary education. Until then, neither the Left nor the Right can effectively engage over conflicts like Australia’s stop-start economic growth or its growing income inequality.

By lashing the Tories for their far-Right frolics, Labor would be doing Australia a favor. It’s almost perfect: the Partys political interest is also, overwhelmingly, the national interest. 

About Daniel Mookhey

Daniel Mookhey

Daniel Mookhey is a Board Director for the Chifley Research Centre, and the Deputy Chair of the NSW Labor Policy Forum. He was the 2013 Federal Campaign Director for the ACTU.

    CONTRIBUTOR click to Donate

    The Chifley Research Centre relies on contributions from individuals and organisations to fund our operations, events and research. Without your donations, nothing we do would be possible.

  • Andrew Giles & Ryan Batchelor

    Andrew Giles is the Federal Labor Member for Scullin in Victoria. Ryan Batchelor is a director of the Chifley Research

    Ben Hugosson

    Benedict Hugosson is an Organisational Ombudsman for the Swedish Social Democrats, focusing on training and membership development. Benedict has experience

    Cameron Clyne

    Cameron Clyne is the former CEO of National Australia Bank and now chairman of advisory firm Camel Partners and a

    Carol Johnson

    Professor Carol Johnson - Carol is an Adjunct Professor of Politics at the University of Adelaide and has written extensively

    Catherine King

    Catherine King is the Shadow Minister for Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Development.

    David Coats

    David Coats is in Australia as a Visitor at the Chifley Research Centre. He is a research fellow at the

    Gabrielle Kuiper

    Dr Gabrielle Kuiper has a background in science, sustainability and urban planning. She was previously Senior Adviser, Climate Change, Energy

    Emma Maiden

    Emma Maiden is the former Assistant Secretary of Unions NSW. She is currently Head of Advocacy for Uniting, leading their

    Erin Watt

    Erin Watt is the National Secretary of the Labor Environment Action Network. Erin is a National Political Coordinator for United

    Jim Chalmers

    Jim Chalmers MP is Shadow Treasurer, and the federal Labor Member for Rankin. Prior to his election he was

    Jo-anne Schofield

    Jo-anne Schofield is the National President of United Workers Union.

    Josh Burns

    Josh Burns is the federal member for Macnamara in Victoria.

    Linda Tirado

    Linda Tirado is a completely average American. She also has good rants about how much it sucks to be poor

    Lindy Edwards

    Dr Lindy Edwards is the Associate Head of School in the School of Humanities and Social Sciences at the University

    Rebecca White

    Rebecca White, Leader of the Tasmanian Labor Opposition

    Terri Butler

    Terri Butler is the Shadow Minister for the Environment and Water, and the federal Labor Member for Griffith, Queensland.

    Tim Kennedy

    Tim Kennedy is national secretary of the United Workers Union, organising for secure jobs and a fair Australia.

    Website design and development by