Labor should fight for economic mobility

Under either prospective leader, Labor should make intergenerational mobility a key part of the Opposition’s economic agenda, writes Jim Chalmers and Mitchell Watt.

Two things will happen this Sunday in Australia.  A new leader of the federal parliamentary Labor Party will be elected.  And approximately eight hundred and fifty children will be born into families of all shapes, sizes and backgrounds.

There is much that is already known about what the future holds in store for these children. The unfortunate reality of the situation is that a child born today into a high-income household in an affluent suburb of Sydney’s northern beaches enjoys a distinctly greater prospect of future success than a child born to working class parents in Logan, in my electorate of Rankin.

The ease with which a child from a disadvantaged background can become a prosperous adult is referred to by economists and sociologists as social mobility. Social mobility is really economicmobility as well.  It is a desirable feature of modern nations as it means that your chance of financial success in life is not determined by your parents’ income, background or postcode.

The opportunity to improve your hand in life is a critical component of Labor’s mission, and giving people the tools to be successful participants in the labour market is the its role in the modern economy.  This is how we help create the economic mobility from one generation to the next, which feeds and fuels the dynamism and creativity central to new sources of growth.

In most research done on the subject, Australia has performed fairly well on measurements of social mobility. Ironically, the United States, the land of the ‘American Dream’, sits alongside the UK close to the bottom of the list of socially mobile countries around the world. In the US, a family which earns just ten per cent less than the average household will have children who grow up to earn about five per cent less than the average wage. In comparison, the children of a similar family in Australia will earn approximately 2.5 per cent less than average.

The lack of social mobility in the United States has captured the attention of President Obama. In an influential presentation to the Centre for American Progress last year, Professor Alan B Krueger, the Chairman of President Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers, adapted Miles Corak’s ‘Great Gatsby curve’, which illustrates the negative relationship between social mobility and income inequality.

Countries with higher levels of inequality, like the US and China, tend to exhibit much lower levels of social mobility than their less unequal counterparts from Scandinavia and Canada. The great cause of concern is that the rising levels of inequality that we have witnessed in the world over the last few decades could result in a decrease in social mobility and reduced prospects for economic success.

Low rates of social mobility are bad not only from an equity perspective but also from the perspective of future economic growth. A decrease in social mobility can result in a rise in working-age citizens becoming disenfranchised from the labour market, which draws on a diminishing pool of talent. And if smart children from poor families face institutional barriers to escaping their backgrounds, society as a whole will experience a distinct loss in human capital, hurting economic output.  These should be the key concerns of Labor’s policy development in this 44th parliament.

The difference between Labor and Liberal is that we believe an inclusive society and a growing economy are complementary, while the conservatives believe they are at odds.  The Abbott Government is showing all the signs of attacking economic mobility via likely changes to the industrial relations, tax and payments systems. Ditching the Better Schools Plan and the NBN will also deny people access to vital tools of personal economic development and leave Australia vulnerable to future increases in inequality.

Proving that a more inclusive society creates the dynamism and innovation necessary for new sources of economic growth should be the core of Labor’s policy vision going forward, under either prospective leader. Developing effective ways to nourish that link between a better society and a more powerful economy is the key to meeting the aspirations of people who want nothing more and nothing less from Labor than the skills and capacities to improve their own lives, creating the economic mobility that every Australian craves for themselves and especially for their kids.

Jim Chalmers is the Labor Member for Rankin in Queensland and the author of ‘Glory Daze: how a world beating nation got so down on itself’.

Mitchell Watt is the current President of Queensland Young Labor. He has degrees in mathematics and economics from the University of Queensland, where he was Graduate of the Year in 2012. Mitchell is currently an adviser to Jim Chalmers, the Member for Rankin.

About Jim Chalmers

Jim Chalmers

Jim Chalmers MP is Shadow Treasurer, and the federal Labor Member for Rankin. Prior to his election he was the Executive Director of the Chifley Research Centre and, before that, Chief of Staff to the Deputy Prime Minister and Treasurer. He has a PhD in political science and international relations and a first class honours degree in public policy. His book Glory Daze was published in July 2013 and he tweets as @JEChalmers .

    CONTRIBUTOR click to Donate

    The Chifley Research Centre relies on contributions from individuals and organisations to fund our operations, events and research. Without your donations, nothing we do would be possible.

  • Ben Hugosson

    Benedict Hugosson is an Organisational Ombudsman for the Swedish Social Democrats, focusing on training and membership development. Benedict has experience

    Cameron Clyne

    Cameron Clyne is the former CEO of National Australia Bank and now chairman of advisory firm Camel Partners and a

    Carol Johnson

    Professor Carol Johnson - Carol is an Adjunct Professor of Politics at the University of Adelaide and has written extensively

    Catherine King

    Catherine King is the Shadow Minister for Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Development.

    David Coats

    David Coats is in Australia as a Visitor at the Chifley Research Centre. He is a research fellow at the

    Gabrielle Kuiper

    Dr Gabrielle Kuiper has a background in science, sustainability and urban planning. She was previously Senior Adviser, Climate Change, Energy

    Emma Maiden

    Emma Maiden is the former Assistant Secretary of Unions NSW. She is currently Head of Advocacy for Uniting, leading their

    Erin Watt

    Erin Watt is the National Secretary of the Labor Environment Action Network. Erin is a National Political Coordinator for United

    Jim Chalmers

    Jim Chalmers MP is Shadow Treasurer, and the federal Labor Member for Rankin. Prior to his election he was

    Jo-anne Schofield

    Jo-anne Schofield is the National President of United Workers Union.

    Linda Tirado

    Linda Tirado is a completely average American. She also has good rants about how much it sucks to be poor

    Lindy Edwards

    Dr Lindy Edwards is the Associate Head of School in the School of Humanities and Social Sciences at the University

    Terri Butler

    Terri Butler is the Shadow Minister for the Environment and Water, and the federal Labor Member for Griffith, Queensland.

    Tim Kennedy

    Tim Kennedy is national secretary of the United Workers Union, organising for secure jobs and a fair Australia.

    Website design and development by