Coalition education policy does not add up

Jim writes for the Drum today on why this is shaping up as a schools election, and why it matters so much.

A common complaint about modern politics is that the two parties are too alike.

A well-worn strategy for oppositions is to present the smallest possible target.

This time is a bit the same (for example, on some but not all budget savings), and yet a lot different.

An incredibly stark choice has emerged. Economic modelling shows that how it is resolved has consequences for our communities and economy for decades to come.

I don’t mean lifting the Goods and Services Tax, though that now appears a real chance if any future Abbott government failed to hold back an alliance of Liberal premiers and the business community, emboldened by another tax review.

And I’m not referring in this instance to harsher industrial relations laws, though again it is hard (if not impossible) to see the Liberal Party resisting big-business pressure for another raid on working conditions and job security.

These are big differences between the two parties with cost-of-living implications for all Australians, and certainly with a great deal of political ‘punch’.

And yet the distinction with perhaps the most to say about the future of our country is the one over schools.

More specifically, between the billions of dollars behind Labor’s vision for school improvement versus the Opposition Leader’s view that the system is not sufficiently broken to warrant the injection of significant new funds.

Like Kevin Rudd in 2007, Abbott’s strategy until recently was to differentiate only on issues where there was a demonstrable advantage. Rudd set out stark choices on climate change and industrial relations, and until now Abbott stuck to the carbon price and asylum seekers.

To differentiate a lot on GST now and a little on industrial relations is unorthodox.

To flag a schools ‘hit list’ of sorts, like Abbott just has with his policy of abandoning the National Plan for School Improvement, is political and economic madness.

Of course, more important than political strategy is what chance kids are given to learn and get ahead, to be the innovators of the future economy.

This is especially crucial when it comes to disadvantaged kids, those from poorer areas, with language difficulties or any other socio-economic barrier to their success. Providing this kind of educational opportunity to these kids can be the core of a country that turns two decades of economic success into something even more impressive – a new era of genuine economic and social mobility.

Get it right and the aggregate economic benefits for Australia will be colossal.

In this respect, an independent report commissioned by the Government from the accounting firm PWC late last year has received insufficient attention. PWC found that dramatically improving the performance of Australian schools has the capacity to double national income over the lifetime of kids born in 2012. And that over the same period, failing to act would cost the economy $1.5 trillion.

These costs and benefits to the economy would go well beyond the $14.5 billion in direct six-year funding at risk in this election because they cascade through time, delivering the improvements to employment prospects, labour force participation, and productivity identified by PWC. Denying schools those billions now means robbing trillions from the country’s future.

The Coalition’s reaction since the Gonski Report was first produced by an independent group of distinguished Australians with links to all school sectors, has been to deny, obscure and obstruct the review’s main finding, that the way in which Australian schools are currently funded is broken and unfair.

On Sunday, New South Wales Premier Barry O’Farrell confirmed that Tony Abbott had spoken to him directly to try to stop him from signing a six-year funding agreement with the Gillard Government, for all schools in his state.

Now Christopher Pyne, the Opposition education spokesman, is saying that they will certainly not “honour” this agreement with New South Wales and refusing to outline a policy position until after the June 30 deadline set by the PM for states to sign up.

The Coalition could not be clearer: a vote for Abbott is a vote to not proceed with extra money for better schools.

So Australian parents shouldn’t be fooled by a tired old style of election commentary that suggests there is a cost-free change option.

On the contrary, Abbott’s rejection of the National Plan for School Improvement has the biggest potential impact on them and the country.

Their GST might go up, their working conditions will likely deteriorate, and new funding for their kids’ schools will hit the fence.

The 2004 election showed how potent any education ‘hit list’ can be as a vote-changing issue if the P&Cs and unions fire up.

That they are mobilising again is welcome, because if they fail to highlight this stark choice between two alternative visions for schools in every suburb and town, and Abbott wins, they can’t say they weren’t warned.

Jim’s article was first published by The Drum Opinion on 22 May 2013.

About Jim Chalmers

Jim Chalmers

Jim Chalmers MP is Shadow Treasurer, and the federal Labor Member for Rankin. Prior to his election he was the Executive Director of the Chifley Research Centre and, before that, Chief of Staff to the Deputy Prime Minister and Treasurer. He has a PhD in political science and international relations and a first class honours degree in public policy. His book Glory Daze was published in July 2013 and he tweets as @JEChalmers .

    CONTRIBUTOR click to Donate

    The Chifley Research Centre relies on contributions from individuals and organisations to fund our operations, events and research. Without your donations, nothing we do would be possible.

  • Ben Hugosson

    Benedict Hugosson is an Organisational Ombudsman for the Swedish Social Democrats, focusing on training and membership development. Benedict has experience

    Cameron Clyne

    Cameron Clyne is the former CEO of National Australia Bank and now chairman of advisory firm Camel Partners and a

    Carol Johnson

    Professor Carol Johnson - Carol is an Adjunct Professor of Politics at the University of Adelaide and has written extensively

    Catherine King

    Catherine King is the Shadow Minister for Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Development.

    David Coats

    David Coats is in Australia as a Visitor at the Chifley Research Centre. He is a research fellow at the

    Gabrielle Kuiper

    Dr Gabrielle Kuiper has a background in science, sustainability and urban planning. She was previously Senior Adviser, Climate Change, Energy

    Emma Maiden

    Emma Maiden is the former Assistant Secretary of Unions NSW. She is currently Head of Advocacy for Uniting, leading their

    Erin Watt

    Erin Watt is the National Secretary of the Labor Environment Action Network. Erin is a National Political Coordinator for United

    Jim Chalmers

    Jim Chalmers MP is Shadow Treasurer, and the federal Labor Member for Rankin. Prior to his election he was

    Jo-anne Schofield

    Jo-anne Schofield is the National President of United Workers Union.

    Linda Tirado

    Linda Tirado is a completely average American. She also has good rants about how much it sucks to be poor

    Lindy Edwards

    Dr Lindy Edwards is the Associate Head of School in the School of Humanities and Social Sciences at the University

    Terri Butler

    Terri Butler is the Shadow Minister for the Environment and Water, and the federal Labor Member for Griffith, Queensland.

    Tim Kennedy

    Tim Kennedy is national secretary of the United Workers Union, organising for secure jobs and a fair Australia.

    Website design and development by