“Egalitarianism is under threat”?

Paula Matthewson is a freelance communications adviser and writer on politics. She was media advisor to John Howard in the early 1990s and has worked in communications, political and advocacy roles for the past 25 years, and blogs regularly on The Drum.

She rolled her eyes on Twitter at Bill Shorten’s statement “Egalitarianism is under threat.”  So we said we’d love to see her justify that in 650 words – and this is what she came up with in an afternoon.  

We’re far from convinced, and we believe this kind of value-neutral, hyper-criticism is a big problem in Australian policy debates – but what do you reckon?

Aside from the factions trying to tear the ALP apart over philosophical differences, the biggest problem Labor leader Bill Shorten has is that Australian voters don’t know what he stands for.

Shorten’s predecessor as opposition leader solved this conundrum by interminably chanting a three word slogan so that even the most disengaged voter ended up knowing that Abbott stood for stopping the boats and fixing the budget.

Shorten has shown no less aptitude than Abbott for negativity, and this is being reflected in his disappointing opinion ratings. However, the current opposition leader has an additional problem, which stems from Labor’s amateurish messaging combined with Shorten’s poor communication skills.

Corny dad jokes and mangled zingers might amuse journalists and comedians, but they don’t help to convince voters that Labor should be considered as a viable alternative.

The hidden power of Abbott’s slogans was that they had a dual purpose; they not only offered an alternative but did so while highlighting the then government’s negatives. So the slogans conveyed that Abbott would stop the boats (unlike Rudd and Gillard who re-opened the borders), scrap the taxes (that increase electricity prices and prevent jobs), and balance the budget (made untenable by those Labor spendthrifts).

In contrast, voters are having trouble making sense of Shorten’s garbled messages and this lack of clarity is reducing everything he says to white noise.

Shorten has moved to address this perception deficit with the early release of some policies, and a headland speech today that dedicates Labor “to the positive plans and policies Australia needs to succeed in the future.” The speech tries to make a connection with voters using Labor’s version of a three-word slogan: a “smart, modern and fair Australia”.

Unfortunately this slogan is a pale motherhood statement next to Abbott’s version. And if there is a dual meaning in those words, then it’s mostly unclear. Will Labor make Australia smart because Abbott has made us dumb? Do we need to be modern because we’re languishing in the previous century?

At least we get the “fair” bit, following on from last year’s budget.

The rest of Shorten’s speech is also a depressing display of the extent to which the opposition leader is being let down by the wordsmiths in his office.

It’s littered with mixed and confusing metaphors that counterproductively distract the reader. Along with barrier draws and winning races, there’s pulling levers, an economic touch screen and Escher staircase economics. The “bright line of self improvement” smacks of British PM David Cameron’s “golden thread” for alleviating poverty, and the mention of high street suggests even more influence from the UK.

And like Labor’s “debt sentence” meme on social media, the speech simply tries too hard. At one point it says the Coalition only ever talks about the future as a dystopian mix of The Hunger Games and Mad Max, and at another throws the switch to hyperbole, warning “egalitarianism is under threat”.

Ultimately, it doesn’t matter that the speech is so poorly written that its flaws distract the reader; at most only a few thousand people will read it through. Most voters will simply note the points reported by the media, and a small percentage of those might remember that Shorten said something about Australia not being able to afford a “dull” budget.

The more important issue is what the speech represents – a Labor communications team that has less idea about what it’s doing than a work experience kid from an ad agency.

On the evidence to date, Shorten’s writers are more interested in gags, memes and hyperbole than delivering what Shorten needs. And what he needs is crisp, clear dual-purpose messages that (1) he is capable of delivering and (2) which convincingly pitches the positives of an alternative Labor government in terms of the current Government’s negatives.

About Paula Matthewson

Paula Matthewson

Paula Matthewson is a freelance communications adviser and writer on politics. She was media advisor to John Howard in the early 1990s and has worked in communications, political and advocacy roles for the past 25 years, and blogs regularly on The Drum.

    CONTRIBUTOR click to Donate

    The Chifley Research Centre relies on contributions from individuals and organisations to fund our operations, events and research. Without your donations, nothing we do would be possible.

  • Andrew Giles & Ryan Batchelor

    Andrew Giles is the Federal Labor Member for Scullin in Victoria. Ryan Batchelor is a director of the Chifley Research

    Ben Hugosson

    Benedict Hugosson is an Organisational Ombudsman for the Swedish Social Democrats, focusing on training and membership development. Benedict has experience

    Cameron Clyne

    Cameron Clyne is the former CEO of National Australia Bank and now chairman of advisory firm Camel Partners and a

    Carol Johnson

    Professor Carol Johnson - Carol is an Adjunct Professor of Politics at the University of Adelaide and has written extensively

    Catherine King

    Catherine King is the Shadow Minister for Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Development.

    David Coats

    David Coats is in Australia as a Visitor at the Chifley Research Centre. He is a research fellow at the

    Gabrielle Kuiper

    Dr Gabrielle Kuiper has a background in science, sustainability and urban planning. She was previously Senior Adviser, Climate Change, Energy

    Emma Maiden

    Emma Maiden is the former Assistant Secretary of Unions NSW. She is currently Head of Advocacy for Uniting, leading their

    Erin Watt

    Erin Watt is the National Secretary of the Labor Environment Action Network. Erin is a National Political Coordinator for United

    Jim Chalmers

    Jim Chalmers MP is Shadow Treasurer, and the federal Labor Member for Rankin. Prior to his election he was

    Jo-anne Schofield

    Jo-anne Schofield is the National President of United Workers Union.

    Josh Burns

    Josh Burns is the federal member for Macnamara in Victoria.

    Linda Tirado

    Linda Tirado is a completely average American. She also has good rants about how much it sucks to be poor

    Lindy Edwards

    Dr Lindy Edwards is the Associate Head of School in the School of Humanities and Social Sciences at the University

    Rebecca White

    Rebecca White, Leader of the Tasmanian Labor Opposition

    Terri Butler

    Terri Butler is the Shadow Minister for the Environment and Water, and the federal Labor Member for Griffith, Queensland.

    Tim Kennedy

    Tim Kennedy is national secretary of the United Workers Union, organising for secure jobs and a fair Australia.

    Website design and development by